SuperyachtNews.com - Operations - CHIRP Report: Pressurised to make a fatal decision

By SuperyachtNews in collaboration with CHIRP Maritime

CHIRP Report: Pressurised to make a fatal decision

A tragic outcome that stemmed from an all too common set of occurrences in the superyacht industry…

The following case study is from Superyacht Feedback, from CHIRP Maritime, the first superyacht-specific programme and publication dedicated to improving safety in the maritime industry through vital knowledge sharing, anonymous reporting, analysis and feedback via the Superyacht Maritime Advisory Board.

Pressurised to make a fatal decision

Initial Report

The superyacht was anchored in a bay where jet skis had been prohibited due to the density of traffic in the anchorage and a spate of previous incidents.

The owner was on board with a fellow guest who drank heavily. They requested that the jet ski be launched. The captain explained that using jet skis was prohibited and ill-advised when inebriated. The owner and his guest were insistent, and this conversation escalated until the captain was given the ultimatum of either launching the jet-ski or being dismissed.

The captain yielded to this threat, and the jet ski launched. Shortly after, the owner’s guest had a high-speed collision with a nearby vessel. The casualty was recovered from the water, unconscious and severely injured; the crew found he was not breathing and commenced CPR, but the casualty died before emergency services arrived.

The result was one death, a traumatised crew and owner, and the captain losing his job. He remained out of work for the following two years while under investigation and threat of criminal prosecution.

Superyacht owners are often demanding and “no” is unfamiliar to them and seen as an insult. Captains who stand their ground risk being side-lined for their professional conduct, and those that do yield to such demands potentially face even more dire consequences.

CHIRP comment

The drink had clouded the judgement of the guest and the owner, but the captain knew that jet-skiing in the bay was prohibited. Even if the owner had sacked the captain on the spot, once they had sobered up, they would most likely have realised that the captain was speaking objectively, not subjectively. However, even when it could place others in danger, it can still be hard to refuse a request or order by an owner, particularly if they are used to getting their way or see refusal as a challenge to their authority.

In this instance, the owner bullied the captain into launching the jet ski against their professional judgement. However, a captain’s first duty is the safety of crew and passengers, and they should have refused, no matter the circumstances.

To avoid such scenarios, captains are encouraged to confirm with the vessel’s owner that they are empowered to refuse requests that put people or the vessel at risk of harm – and, crucially, that they will be listened to. Ideally, this should be done as early in the professional relationship as possible – potentially even at the interview. Shrewd owners will accept that the captain is looking after their interests.

Where such assurances are not forthcoming, this should be a ‘red flag’ to the captain that safety on board is at some point likely to be compromised. Better to seek alternative employment at that point than find oneself being threatened with the sack in the heat of the moment. CHIRP wants to state that the master has other places to report this coercion, which should be made known to the master.

Key issues relating to this report

Fit for duty: Drink had impaired the judgement of both the guest and the owner.

Pressure/culture: The owner bullied the captain into going against their professional judgement. On board, such behaviour was reflected in the safety culture (and probably the welfare culture).

CHIRP Maritime, a UK-registered charity, has launched Superyacht Feedback, the first superyacht-specific programme and publication to improve safety in the maritime industry through confidential reporting and safety analysis onboard. To register, or submit your own feedback, please click here.

Profile links

CHIRP Maritime

Join the discussion

CHRIP Report: Pressurised to make a fatal decision

34656

To post comments please Sign in or Register

When commenting please follow our house rules


Click here to become part of The Superyacht Group community, and join us in our mission to make this industry accessible to all, and prosperous for the long-term. We are offering access to the superyacht industry‚Äôs most comprehensive and longstanding archive of business-critical information, as well as a comprehensive, real-time superyacht fleet database, for just £10 per month, because we are One Industry with One Mission. Sign up here.

Related news

Image for CHIRP report: Near miss approaching port

CHIRP report: Near miss approaching port

This case study examines how a dangerous approach speed and distractions on the bridge nearly led to a grounding

Crew

Image for Introducing: Superyacht Feedback

Introducing: Superyacht Feedback

CHIRP Maritime aims to elevate safety standards via the industry-specific Superyacht Feedback publication

Crew

Image for When safe navigation becomes passive research

When safe navigation becomes passive research

Matthew Zimmerman, CEO at FarSounder, explains how sonar systems can help complete our understanding of the seafloor…

Technology

Image for The Nuclear Equation

The Nuclear Equation

Developments across the marine industry suggest the idea of a nuclear-powered superyacht may not be as science fiction as it once sounded

Technology

Image for Another week, another fire

Another week, another fire

Instead of searching for specific factors to blame, the time is right to reflect on safety across the industry

Opinion

Sign up to the SuperyachtNews Bulletin

The SuperyachtNews App

Follow us on