New IMO regulations that restrict Sulphur oxide emissions within Emission Control Areas (ECAs) will come into force on 1 January 2015 and will apply to all vessels operating in the Baltic Sea, North Sea, ‘North American area’ and United States Caribbean Sea.

While the 0.10% m/m limit will not affect superyachts, it will impact upon the commercial fleet, in terms of the composition of fuel used. Many vessels operating in these areas will be required to switch to a significantly lower sulphur fuel, such as the marine gas oil (MGO) used by the superyacht fleet.

Commenting on the impact of the incoming changes on the Ship and Bunker website, Dynamic Oil Trading’s CEO’s, Lars Møller said, "The only way to avoid the risk of an impact on operations or the risk of non-compliance with the 2015 ECA standards is to prepare now… There is uncertainty across the entire industry over the impact of the new sulphur regulations, but this can be managed and the costs can be mitigated through a proactive approach to planning ahead and by working with fuel [suppliers].”



SuperyachtNews.com was contacted by Dan-Bunkering, which has recently established a superyacht-specific operation in Monaco, about this issue. Yacht fuel trader, Rory Spurway explained that the demands being made of the commercial fleet will reverberate around the supply chain, with the result being an initial rise in the price of MGO, a factor that will affect the superyacht fleet.

The Monaco operation’s MD, Jesper Møller Christensen said the sheer number of merchant vessels that would be forced to comply with the changes would “significantly increase demand”. “Everybody knows that they will have to pay significantly more”, he added, “and the guys buying low-sulphur, heavy fuel of around six hundred and fifty or seven hundred dollars a tonne will have to pay a thousand dollars a tonne for the MGO coming in in January.”

Christensen clarified that January’s changes will not lead to a cataclysmic fuel shortage; he does however think it will have price implications for bunkering in 2015. 


The IMO's incoming regulations are an attempt to drastically curb sulphur emissions.

Dan-Bunkering claims to be able to circumvent this predicted price hike, with a futures-based fixed term agreement, as Spurway explained: “What we are able to offer is a fixed priced agreement (FPA), which provides the boat with a fixed price for that time period. For example, we would evaluate previous fuel consumption, future charter agreements and future cruising plans which will gives us a good estimate of the volume of fuel which that vessel will consume over the summer season, May-September. This will allow the yacht to bunker throughout the season with the fuel already available and allocated to the yacht at an agreed price. The yacht would simply have to inform me of where they require the bunker and it would be delivered.”

In theory, hedging bets on fuel price increases would seemingly appeal to management companies and charter fleets who could then offer it to all yachts under their auspices. But according to Peninsula Petroleum’s Richard Peacock, this well-established commercial model doesn’t work when applied to yachting.



“Yes, there will be a trickle-down price change but, the yachting industry being what it is, I don’t think it will be such a huge economic adversity”, Peacock explained. “It’s a great idea to hedge – we’ve looked at it in-depth – but we’ve found it really, really difficult. A million litres of fuel for a million pounds might sound like a lot of money to your or me, but when it comes to trying to hedge something, it’s actually quite small.”

Christensen said he felt the reason hedging had yet to be applied to the superyacht industry was because of its complexity. Prices, he added, would be hedged against those found in the recognised ports, with requests from smaller locations linked to these figures.

Profile links

International Maritime Organization (IMO)

Peninsula Petroleum Ltd